| 
    
  | 
    
    ![]()  | 
  
    
    
  | 
    
    
     
 When the Kid Who Can, Won't 
       by James D. Sutton, Ed.D. Compliance is a part of life. Someone (especially 
        someone in authority, like a boss) asks you to do something. If you do 
        it, fine. If you don't, there's a problem. If you consistently don't do 
        it, there's trouble. Educators and family counselors will tell you that 
        this problem, noncompliance, has reached our children. Exactly what is 
        the problem? Simple; a noncompliant youngster probably won't fail 
        family, but he can fail the fourth grade. When we're talking about 
        capable young people, this is unacceptable. Psychologist and author Dr. James Sutton has been 
        studying noncompliance and other forms of oppositional and defiant 
        behavior in young people since the early '70s; he wrote his dissertation 
        on the subject in 1981. His particular interest has always been the 
        study of these behaviors in children and adolescents who have friends 
        and solid family ties, and who are not in trouble with the law; he calls 
        it the "Good Kid" Disorder. In short, these are good kids with very 
        irritating behaviors. There are plenty of them. "Over the past 25 years or so, there has been a steady 
        increase in oppositional and defiant behaviors in children," Sutton 
        says. "Since this behavior can bring on a great deal of strife in 
        families and at school, behaviors like noncompliance, pouting and 
        stubbornness, obstructionism (interfering with the plans and activities 
        of others), and underachievement at school are difficult to tolerate, 
        let alone handle effectively." His new book, "If My Kid's So Nice ... Why's He 
        Driving ME Crazy? Straight Talk About the 'Good Kid' Disorder" (Friendly 
        Oaks Publications, 1997), points out few reasons why noncompliance is 
        seen so often today in capable youngsters. For example, noncompliance is 
        a common behavior of youngsters who have sustained a crisis (such as the 
        loss of a loved one). It is a component of recovery as youngsters 
        attempt to regain appropriate control and autonomy in their lives. 
        Fortunately, these behaviors are usually temporary; they go away as 
        adjustments are made. Still other children appear to be oppositional and 
        defiant from birth, with apparently no external factors influencing the 
        behavior. "The doctor pops this child on the bottom in the delivery 
        room, and he refuses to cry; it's been struggle, struggle, struggle ever 
        since," Sutton shares. By far, however, most oppositional and defiant 
        youngsters seem to cling tightly to a resentment toward authority. This 
        resentment is centered in the youngster's perception of adult 
        expectations about his or her performance. More often than not, the 
        child is not open to discussing it. The noncompliance does all the 
        talking. In the book, Sutton offers a number of ideas, 
        interventions, and strategies for turning out a happier and more 
        compliance son, daughter, or student. Two of the most powerful 
        interventions are affirmation and empowerment. "Unknowingly, we have become much too conditional in 
        the way we regard our children," he observes. "Too many kids today feel 
        that they have to produce or somehow earn recognition from their 
        parents, and they are troubled and resentful about it." Short affirmations are a good place to begin. A parent 
        can say to their child, for instance, "You know Suzie, I know that I 
        don't say it often enough, but you really are one of the best things 
        that ever came into my life. I'm so glad that you are my daughter. You 
        don't have to say anything; I just wanted you to know." The real secret 
        for making this sort of affirmation "stick" is to immediately ask a 
        non-related question, leave the room quickly, or in some other way make 
        it comfortable for the youngster not to respond to what you just told 
        them. This can be powerful stuff. Offering choices is an excellent way to empower a youngster, and it goes a long way in better ensuring that the child will initiate and complete that which she has selected (thus directly dealing with noncompliance). For instance, a youngster can be given five cards, each of which has an assigned home or school task written on it. The youngster is told that, if he or she begins the tasks within the next ten minutes, and completes them, only three need to be done; two cards can be returned. This approach not only eliminates a number of hassles, it is perceived by the child as a fair and reasonable gesture. It won't "cure" the problem of noncompliance overnight, but it is a move in the right direction. 
  | 
    
     | 
  
    
  |